Menu Close
Screen Shot 2018-07-10 at 10.30.59 AM

  • UHS of Delaware v. United Health Services, Inc., et al. (M.D. Pa.) – Representing United Health Services and six subsidiaries against allegations of trademark infringement
  • Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. Innovia Films Limited, et al. (E.D. Tex.) – Represented Innovia in patent dispute involving biodegradable film patents
  • Gerda Edwards v. Janice L.M. Buxbaum and Enterprise Optimization Solutions, Inc. (E.D. Va.) – Represented Janice Buxbaum and Enterprise Optimization Solutions in case involving business disputes and the pursuit of tort claims
  • Summit Data Systems LLC v. Infortrend Corporation, et al. (D. Del.) – Represented Infortrend against allegations of patent infringement involving RAID storage systems
  • The PACid Group, LLC v. SerComm Corporation, et al. (E.D. Tex.) – Represented SerComm against allegations of patent infringement involving network equipment
  • EON Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. SerComm Corporation, et al. (N.D. Ca.) – Represented SerComm against allegations of patent infringement involving network equipment
  • Agio International Company, Ltd. v. Numark Industries (E.D. Va.) – Represented Numark against allegations of infringement of chair design patent
  • Fonar Corporation v. HealthSouth Corporation (E.D.N.Y) – Represented HealthSouth against allegations of patent infringement of the multi-angle oblique imaging feature on MRI scanners
  • Ciena Corporation v. Corvis Corporation (D. Del.) – Represented Corvis against allegations of patent infringement of Wavelength Division Multiplexing system used in fiber optic communications
  • Trounson Automation LLC v. Yaskawa Electric Corporation (E.D. Tx.) – Represented Trounson in pursuing patent infringement of a machine tool servo control system
  • Leighton Technologies LLC v. Oberthur Card System; and HID Corporation v. Leighton Technologies LLC (N.D. Ohio and C.D. Cal.) – Representing Leighton in multiple cases pursuing patent infringement of a process for manufacturing plastic cards with integrated circuits
  • Linz v. Campbell Soup (D.N.J.) - Represented Campbell Soup against allegations of trade secret misappropriation and design patent infringement involving gravity feed displays used to sell soup products
  • Motorola v. Qualcomm and Qualcomm v. Motorola (S.D. Ca.) - Represented Qualcomm in a series of lawsuits covering 10 patents that included Qualcomm’s CDMA standard technology, as well as Motorola’s flip phone design
  • TRG Accessories, LLC v. InGEAR Corporation, Olivet International, Inc. v. InGEAR Corporation, and Cool Gear International, Inc. v. InGEAR Corporation – Represented InGEAR against allegations of infringement of trademark, and utility and design patents involving luggage
  • Western Phase Change v. Sterilube – Represented Western Phase Change in patent litigation involving lubricant for dental hand pieces
  • Kvaerner Chemetics v. Fleck – Represented Kvaerner in pursuing patent infringement of catalytic converter used in sulfuric acid production
  • Patent Monetization Entity Licensing Negotiations. Represent high-technology companies in negotiations with various patent monetization entities including Rockstar, Innovatio, Digimedia, LaserDynamics, Helferich and numerous others.
  • LaserDynamics USA, LLC v. Advanced Duplication Services, LLC (S.D.N.Y.), Defend ADS in patent infringement case involving DVD formats.
  • WAG Acquisition v. Coolvision Ltd, et al. (D.N.J.), Defend Coolvision in patent infringement case involving streaming video over the Internet.
  • Bright Response v. Infosys Ltd. (E.D. Tex.), Defend Infosys in patent infringement case concerning contextual interpretation of email.
  • Bright Response v. Infosys (E.D. Tex.), Defend Infosys in patent infringement case involving automatic review and response to emails
  • Cambrian Science v. Cox Communications, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal), Defend CCI in patent infringement case involving photonic integrated circuits.
  • Digimedia v. Cox Radio, et al. (D. Del.), Defend Cox Radio in patent infringement case involving digital music broadcast systems, including parallel reexamination challenges to the patents in the PTO.
  • Teles AG v. Cisco Systems (D.D.C./D. Del.), Represent patent owner in a patent infringement case involving VoIP technology.
  • Teles AG v. Quintum Technologies (D. Del.), Represent patent owner in a patent infringement case involving VoIP technology.
  • Technologies Patents LLC v. Motorola, et al. (D. Md.), Defend Motorola in patent infringement case involving international text messaging.
  • Broadcom v. Qualcomm (ITC/S.D. Cal.), Defend Qualcomm in patent infringement case involving power management and multiplexing in wireless phone system, including parallel reexamination challenges to the patents in the PTO.
  • Rasterex Holdings v. Research In Motion (Ga. Sup. Ct.), Defend Research In Motion in a trade secrets case involving software for converting and displaying files on wireless device.
  • Matsushita Electric v. Samsung Electronics (Fed. Cir.), Defend Samsung Electronics in a patent infringement case involving memory chip design.
  • Toshiba v. Samsung Electronics (ITC/D.N.J.), Defend Samsung Electronics in patent infringement case involving memory circuit design and manufacture.
  • NTP v. Research In Motion (E.D. Va./Fed. Cir.), Replace trial counsel after unfavorable verdict and defend Research In Motion in a patent infringement case involving wireless mobile email system, including parallel reexamination challenges in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.
  • On Demand Machine Corp. v. Ingram Industries (Fed. Cir.), Defend Ingram Industries in a patent infringement case involving on-demand book publishing systems, including filing parallel reexamination challenge in the PTO.
  • ePlus v. Ariba (E.D. Va.), Defend Ariba in patent infringement case involving electronic database systems.
  • Linear Tech. v. Impala Linear Corp. (Fed. Cir.) Defend Linear Tech. in a patent infringement case involving switching voltage regulators.
  • Verizon California v. Ronald Katz Tech. (N.D. Cal.) Defend Verizon California in a patent infringement case involving interactive telephone call processing systems.
  • Applied Medical Resources v. U.S. Surgical (C.D. Cal./Fed. Cir.) Represent patent owner Applied Medical Resources in a patent infringement case involving trocar floating seals for minimally invasive surgery
  • Applied Medical Resources v. Core Dynamics (C.D. Cal.) Represent patent owner in a patent infringement case involving trocar floating seals for minimally invasive surgery.
  • Symbol Techs. v. Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation (Fed. Cir.) Represent amicus National Retail Federation in a patent infringement case involving bar code readers, which amicus brief was credited for Federal Circuit granting interlocutory appeal on prosecution laches defense.
  • Applied Medical Resources v. U.S. Surgical (E.D. Va./Fed. Cir.) Represent patent owner in a patent infringement case involving trocar floating seals for minimally invasive surgery.
  • Motorola v. Qualcomm (S.D. Cal.) Represent patent owner and defendant Qualcomm in a patent infringement case involving mobile phone circuit design and wireless protocols.
  • Steelcase v. Haworth (D. Mich.) Defend Haworth in a patent infringement case involving office furniture.
  • Wyttenbach v. Atoma Int’l and Toyota Motor Corp. (Fed. Cir.) Defend Atoma Int’l in a patent infringement case involving child car seats.

Working Smarter to Achieve Your Business Goals